9/11 – The Perfect Crime?

I still remember where I was on September 11, 2001. At the time I was living in Brisbane Australia, and when I got home from work that day, I thought it was going to be just another evening at home watching TV with my flatmates.
Interestingly, in view of what I am about to say, it was another TV show I had watched weeks earlier which crossed my mind first. That show was the Lone Gunmen pilot, which featured a plot to fly a remote-controlled airliner into the World Trade Center. The full episode is featured below, but if you fast forward to the last 10 minutes of the episode you’ll see the gripping finale as the plane narrowly misses crashing into the WTC tower.
 

 
Anyway, on that fateful night while 3000 people were dying on the other side of the world, I was watching a TV show which for a brief moment seemed to me to be a sequel to a show of which I had been looking forward to watching further episodes. Of course it soon became clear that this was an event of historical importance, as over the next hour or so, not just one but two planes crashed into 2 towers, causing them to collapse in their entirety. Or so it seemed at the time…

Fast forward to 2011. This week I watched a video by a Russian ex Soviet nuclear intelligence officer who claims that not only did no planes hit the towers that day, but that their total collapse was caused by 3 nuclear demolition devices buried below the foundations of WTC1, WTC2 and WTC7 at the time of their construction. Apparently he came across the information about the existence of these devices years before while employed by the Soviet military, as it was his job to know about all things nuclear which might affect the Soviet Union in its cold war with the USA. You can see the video below: (there are 2 parts)

Now before you dismiss this as yet another crazy conspiracy theory, consider the following:
 
The official (and the generally accepted) theory behind why the towers collapsed is not credible for some really obvious reasons.
 
Firstly, an aluminium tube does not make a good sledgehammer. It’s strong enough for packaging purposes (e.g. as a cigar tube or a beer can, or for carrying passengers from A to B) but when it comes up against 200,000 tonnes of steel in a building which was specifically designed by the architects to withstand the impact of a Boeing 707, there is no contest. A similarly sized aircraft, the Boeing 767 could not slice into the interior of the WTC like a knife through butter, as we all saw on our TV screens.

So why do most people accept the explanation given by the media? My theory is that television, or visual media generally, have blurred our distinction between what is fact, and what is fiction. That’s what I hinted at in the first paragraph of this article. Simply put, because I had seen the “planes crashing into buildings as a terrorist plot” scenario before, in the Lone Gunmen fictional TV show, my mind was attuned to the possibility of it happening in real life. And it was the visual aspect of this scenario that impressed itself on my mind most. So why did my years of scientific education (I studied both physics and chemistry up to Stage 2 University level) not override my credulity and willingness to accept that 2 airliners had taken down not 2 but 3 buildings which were designed by engineers to prevent them from even intruding into the building, let alone demolish them as efficiently as if they had been prepped with explosives by demolition experts? Answer: because I SAW it happen. My eyes deceived me.
 
The intriguing thing about the nuclear demolition claim is that apparently when buildings such as the WTC twin towers in New York and the Sears Tower in Chicago were first proposed, the city authorities required the builders to also submit a demolition plan, as at some point these buildings would become decrepit and need to be replaced. And get this, the ONLY way that building engineers could conceive of, to efficiently demolish these immensely strong, steel framed skyscrapers, was to plant a large nuclear charge below their foundations which would basically send a massive shockwave upwards through the building, turning it into dust. The same kind of dust we saw mushrooming out of the Twin Towers a decade ago. This was not primarily concrete dust, as most people think, it was mostly steel dust, as only the floors of the tower were concrete, the majority of it was steel, along with other materials. Here are 2 more videos outlining the main points of the WTC nuclear demolition theory:

(The video above refers to micronukes which is a variation on Dimitri’s theory, but is not an adequate explanation according to him)
 

(This video is a condensation of Dimitri’s theory if you don’t have time to watch the full version, which I would recommend.)
 

(Update from Dimitri, November 18 2012)
 
So who did this, and why was it covered up, not thoroughly investigated, as air crashes generally are? According to Dimitri Khalezov, the masterminds were the same people meeting this week at the Bildeberger conference in Switzerland, a shadowy group of elitists who want world government, and who used similarly minded intelligence operatives from Israel and France to carry out the plot. Why would they do this? To justify an all-out assault on the Middle East oil countries, with the purpose of defeating the last remaining obstacles to world government. And that is what we have seen over the last decade, continuing to the present day with a war in Libya and revolutions in Egypt, Tunisia and Syria in the last year. As to why it was not investigated, these people are the elite, at the top of the pyramid if you like. They have the ability to inhibit or control investigation, up to a point. But they don’t yet control the internet.
 
Still not convinced? Think again about why you believe what you believe. Because you saw it on TV, which is controlled by powerful media corporations who may be influenced by the profit motive, or political motives, or both, or because it makes sense and is in line with the laws of science, or dare I say it, with what God is telling you in your spirit is true? Believe it – or not, as a man called Ripley used to say…
 
For more information on the nuclear demolition of the WTC, click here.
 
Here’s an interesting diagram found on Wikipedia at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_weapons_testing


 
The diagram apparently represents four types of nuclear explosions conducted in various environments:
1) atmospheric; 2) underground; 3) exoatmospheric; 4) underwater.
 
Now why would they position a certain tall structure above an underground nuclear explosion (2)?

This is a classic diagram from the ‘70s. In those days nuclear explosions were not yet regarded as “evil” and were widely discussed. And it was not yet a big secret in those days – that underground nuclear explosions could be successfully used for demolishing skyscrapers…
 


This is a diagram of how it was done – one nuke detonated in a cavity prepared 30+ years before the event…
 

And finally here’s a report about the demolition of WTC 7 and the awareness of it 10 years on…
 

 
Update April 2011:
I just found this light-hearted 5-minute summary of the official 9/11 conspiracy theory…enjoy…

Update August 2013:

Dimitri has just produced the 4th edition of his “Third Truth” ebook – Download here.

No Comments

Be the first to start a conversation

Leave a Reply

  • (will not be published)

*

WP-SpamFree by Pole Position Marketing